![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thermally
conductive carbon filler in wood-based composites
Abstract May, 01/Forest Products Journal / -- In conventional approaches
to reducing the press time of wood composites, high press temperatures
and/or an external catalyst is often used to accelerate the resin cure
rate to obtain acceptable press times. This paper explored the concept
of combining a thermally conductive carbon filler material (e.g., synthetic
graphite) with wood particles and flakes as a means to promote resin cure.
The experimental results indicate that synthetic graphite does not act
as a catalyst. Rather, graphite allows a faster resin cure by accelerating
the heat (higher temperatures) into wood composites due to its higher
thermal conductivity (600 Wm^sup -1^ K^sup -1^) as compared to the low
thermal conductivity of the wood (0.2 Wm^sup - 1^K^sup -1^).
Wood-based composite boards are panels manufactured from comminuted wood materials (e.g., particles, flakes, fibers, etc.) combined typically with a thermoset resin and bonded under heat and pressure in a hot-press (Maloney 1993). In such a manufacturing process, the productivity of a plant and the quality of the board depend on several factors, such as resin cure time, wood geometry, wood moisture content (MC), wood orientation, board density, wax content, etc. Among these factors, resin cure may be the most important because the physical integrity and durability ofthe panel relate very strongly to resin cure during the hot-pressing process. Generally, the efficiency of the press is crucial to the quality of the boards and the output of the plant (Park et al. 1999). Since synthetic adhesives used in wood composite panel manufacture are heat reactive, the efficiency of the hot-press decreases with increasing thickness of the mat; this is due to the poor heat conductivity of dry wood. The pressing time is strongly related to the heat transfer, which affects the curing rate of the resin. In other words, the transmission of heat from the mat faces to the core is a critical factor in determining the final press time. Because of the poor heat conductivity of wood, the cure of the resin takes place first in the faces when the hot platens touch the mat during pressing, while the core of the board is still cold. Consequently, longer time will be needed for sufficient heat to reach the core of the board, which will allow the middle (core) of the board to cure. Several methods, used alone or in combinations, have been developed to accelerate the resin curing. These include pressing the panels at higher platen temperatures, use of different catalysts, additives, and modified resin formulations (Barry and Corneau 1999, Park et al. 1999, Sellers 1985). However, the internal or external catalyst is generally justified only if it will produce shorter press times at lower concentration in the range of 0.25 to 1 percent by weight of the resin (Maloney 1993). On the other hand, higher pressing temperatures are generally avoided because of the increased energy cost combined with the production of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (Barry et al. 2001, 2000). Press times have also been reduced through manipulation of MC in the mat (Maloney 1993). High-frequency electrical heating has also been tried, in place of contact heating, due to its principle of curing the complete mat virtually simultaneously instead of heat penetrating only from the surface (Maloney 1993). Although this technique can cure the resin significantly faster, there are many practical difficulties, particularly involving the insulation of multi-platen presses. In addition, the density profile through the board will be affected and the generally desirable high-density surface layers (for higher bending strength and stiffness) prove difficult to attain with this method of resin curing (Maloney 1993). Although resin curing has been shortened dramatically through the approaches just mentioned, there is still need to develop cost-effective and environmentally friendly approaches to accelerate resin curing (or reduce the press times). One approach to improving thermal conductivity of a wood composite is through the addition of a thermally conductive filler material, such as synthetic carbon (Matuana and King 2001 a, 2001b). Typical thermal conductivity values for some common materials are 0.2 for wood, 1 for carbon black, 10 for carbonized polyacrylonitrile (PAN) based carbon fibers, 234 for aluminum, 400 for copper, and 600 for graphite (all values in Wm^sup -1^K^sup - 1^) (Torrey 2001). Thus, carbon filters may act as a heat transfer medium by facilitating the transfer of heat from the faces to the core of the panel. This faster heat transfer may shorten the press time during wood composite panels manufacturing. Increased wood thermal conductivity will also promote lignin flow during pressing, which will help the pressed board to remain at the pressed dimensions. This will reduce internal stresses within the board and consequently lead to more dimensionally stable panels. The main goal of this work was to explore the concept of combining carbon fillers with wood flakes/particles as a means to promote resin cure and/or improve the dimensional stability of the panels. Methodology Particleboard panels were manufactured as follows. Dried wood particles
(5% MC) were placed in a rotating-drum blender and sprayed with 5 percent
liquid PF resin (based on ovendry weight of the furnish). After this
blending operation, wood particles were placed in a 20-L high-intensity
mixer (Papenmeier, Type TGAHK20). Synthetic graphite was added and mixed
with PF-coated wood furnish for 5 minutes. The concentration of synthetic
graphite was fixed at 30 percent based on PF weight (approximately 1.7%
of the ovendry weight of wood particles).
The temperature profile during hot-pressing was recorded during pressing and the results (Fig. 1) clearly show the potential for synthetic graphite to enhance the heat conductivity of wood during hot pressing of the board. The temperature at the core of the panel reached 121 deg C (250 deg F) after only 225 seconds when synthetic graphite was incorporated into the PF resin compared to 270 seconds for panels without synthetic graphite. The following conclusions were drawn from the experimental results from the data of the physical and mechanical properties of flakeboards made with Borden Chemical face PF resin (Cascophen OS707) (Table 3): * Synthetic graphite did not statistically degrade the flexural strength
of the flakeboard panels but the flexural moduli of the boards were
statistically different. Literature cited Barry, A.O. and D. Comeau. 1999. Volatile organic chemicals emissions from OSB as a function of processing parameters. Holzforschung 53(4):441-446. and R. Lovell. 2000. Press volatile organic compound emissions as a function of wood particleboard processing parameters. Forest Prod. J. 50(10):35-42. R. Lepine, R. Lovell, and S. Raymond. 2001. Response surface methodology study of VOCs in plywood press emissions. Forest Prod. J. 51(l):65-73. Maloney, T.M. 1993. Modem particleboard and dry-process fiberboard manufacturing. Updated edition. Miller Freeman Publications, Inc., San Francisco, CA. 681 pp. Matuana, L.M. and J.A. King. 2001a. Veneer-based product and method of manufacture. U.S. Patent filed July 13, 2001 with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. and .200 lb. Wood-based composite board and method of manufacture. U.S. Patent filed July 13, 2001 with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Park, B.D., B. Riedl, E.W. Hsu, and J. Shields 1999. Differential scanning calorimetry of phenol-formaldehyde resins cure-accelerated by carbonates. Polymer 40:1689-1699. Sellers, T. Jr. 1985. Plywood and Adhesive Technology, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. 661 pp. Torrey, K.S. 2001. Influence of thermally conductive fillers on the physical properties of wafer board. MS thesis. Michigan Tech. Univ., Houghton, Mt. 298 pp. Laurent M. Matuana* The author is an Assistant Professor, Dept. of Forestry, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824-1222. Partial funding for this project was provided by the School of Forestry and Wood Products, Michigan Technological University. The author gratefully acknowledges the help of Peter DeJong (undergraduate student) and Dr. Fatih Mengeloglu (former Ph.D. Student) in conducting this research. The author gratefully acknowledges the reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive comments on the paper. This paper was received for publication in June 2002. Article No. 9507. *Forest Products Society Member.
Did you find this material interesting? Do you want more information of this type? Comment via FEEDBACK
Source: Forest Products Journal Copyright Forest Products Society Mar 2003
Please patronize our many sponsors, affiliates and advertisers today so that we may bring you more advanced services tomorrow. Have you seen the great deals from top brand name manufacturers?
|
|
|